8 comments

  • standeven14 hours ago
    When I was a young teen, I volunteered at the local YMCA to help set up a "haunted house" (actually a squash court) for Halloween. One of the decorations I pulled out of a storage closet was a display skeleton. I set it up and was having fun playing around with it when I noticed it had some metal fillings in the teeth...and everything was a bit TOO realistic.

    I still get the heebie-jeebies thinking about it.

    • boomboomsubban13 hours ago
      It's happened before, see Elmer McCurdy who they discovered wasn't actually a wax figure while filming a TV show https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elmer_McCurdy
      • DidYaWipe11 hours ago
        The TV show was The Six Million Dollar Man.
    • ceejayoz12 hours ago
      My dad, during med school, had to purchase a human skeleton.

      We're not quite sure what to do with it now. I'd like to give it a respectful burial, without causing a police response.

      • aguaviva10 hours ago
        I'd like to give it a respectful burial, without causing a police response.

        Unfortunately that's not an option.

        A respectful burial means contacting the authorities so that the remains can be properly identified, and their final disposition noted in the public record. Remember this was once a human being, likely with many relations, however far back. The remains could be of someone entirely forgotten, but could be the missing link in some family's long and painfully sad story, also.

        Meanwhile, the tail risk of getting into some kind of trouble for attempting to sidestep this necessary process is quite considerable.

        So there's really only one course of action available to your father's heirs. Since there's also a small but considerable chance of being hit with some kind of charge (even if you do contact the authorities in perfectly good faith, and presuming of course that no hanky panky was involved in acquiring the skeleton on the first place), the first step will be to contact a criminal defense lawyer.

        Quite some inheritance you were left with, there.

        See also: https://www.npr.org/2024/10/25/nx-s1-5165150/skull-found-hou...

        • ceejayoz8 hours ago
          There’s a difference between “authorities” and “police”. I’m fully aware it will need to be done through official channels.
          • aguaviva8 hours ago
            Right, but contacting authorities implies automatically a significant chance that the police will be contacted also (no matter what they might say to you initially).

            Once that happens, you have no control over their response.

            • mojomark5 hours ago
              I was going to look this up to verify, but realized googling "do they still sell actual human..." probably isn't something I want in my search history. So, I'll just say, as a not-noo-fuzzy-recollection, I'm pretty certain that to this day some people who's bodies are donated to science may end up as actual educational props for medical students. In that light, the above thoughts about wanting/needing to track down this person and contact families seems unnecessary as that person did this intentionally.

              That said, I absolutely recall seeing a documentary, in modern day, showing people's bodies used in science exhibits to this day. Their point was that while people had voluntarily donated their body to science, they were mostly unaware that this type of display was something that might happen.

          • wbl7 hours ago
            Why wouldn't you want a lawyer to help you? They are the only person who will be on your side in this no matter what.
      • CoastalCoder12 hours ago
        Maybe give the local DA a call and ask for advice?
      • GuB-4210 hours ago
        What about calling the med school back? They may have a use for it for teaching (as your dad did), and if not, it should be a question they are familiar with.
      • fluoridation12 hours ago
        Immure it and leave it as a surprise for the future to find. Bonus points for leaving confusing clues around the house.
  • throwup23817 hours ago
    > The skeleton’s bones are held together by wire, like you would see in a school biology set, and he suspects the IORM ordered the body through a catalog.

    Kind of buried the lede there.

    > He and Hatem believe The Bluebird’s skeleton could be that of a woman, based on its small stature and broad hips. Benkert said a historian he consulted in 2017 guessed the skeleton may have been a young man, possibly from India.

    Given the timing, India or the dead body of an unclaimed indigent were my first guesses.

    • GJim16 hours ago
      In the late 19th and early 20th century it was commonplace for educational skeletons to be made from real bodies, frequently sold by poor Indian families. This only stopped when plastic became a practical option.

      And before somebody cries foul; education is very important, and real bodies were once the only source of durable anatomically correct teaching skeletons.

      • mncharity11 hours ago
        In 18th to early 19th century US/England, body snatching aka grave robbing was a common activity of medical students. And in England, it was a profession. As was guarding the freshly buried against such. When New York Hospital and Columbia didn't limit themselves to blacks, you got the 1788 Doctors' Riot and several deaths. A riot at Yale in 1824.

        I wonder if you could teach history by emphasizing "surprises for the time traveler"?

      • giarc16 hours ago
        A colleague of mine studied physiology and anatomy at McGill University likely in the 1970s. She said the cadavers were mainly unclaimed bodies of homeless people from the city of Montreal. The rule was that all work was to be done in the university labs, but she said students often snuck body parts out to conduct dissection work after hours in their dorm rooms. A lot has changed in the field, but it wasn't that long ago that we treated the dead like a tool.
        • throw_pm2315 hours ago
          Times have changed, now the living are treated no better. I kid, I kid.
        • lemonberry12 hours ago
          In Michael Crichton's, "Travels", he discusses his experience dissecting a human body while in med school. The two most memorable bits: 1) the dissection triggered a hunger response in people and 2) they kept the hands covered to help the students dehumanize the body. I don't mean "dehumanize" in the sense of removing their dignity, but the hands apparently can make it more difficult to study the body as a subject and not a dead human.

          I read it years ago, but remember really enjoying it.

          • pstrateman11 hours ago
            >the dissection triggered a hunger response in people

            this is supposedly from the formaldehyde

        • wslh15 hours ago
          Medical schools in countries like Argentina use cadavers as an essential tool for teaching anatomy, allowing students to gain hands-on experience and a deeper understanding of human anatomy.
          • bhickey15 hours ago
            You may have misunderstood the above comment. While using cadavers in medical education is commonplace, _taking body parts home_ is no longer the norm.
            • chasil15 hours ago
              However, cadaver parts are now surgically implanted in patients for a variety of reasons, and those are certainly taken home.

              A quick search results in "allograft bone."

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bone_grafting

              • fluoridation12 hours ago
                How is that related to medical students taking body parts out of a lab and dissecting them at home?
                • chasil11 hours ago
                  The body parts are going home.

                  In some contexts, this is forbidden, unorthodox, or expected.

    • lordfrito13 hours ago
      > Given the timing, India or the dead body of an unclaimed indigent

      International treaty, all skeletons come from India. [0]

      At least this is what was claimed in The Return of the Living Dead.

      [0] https://clip.cafe/videos/international-treaty.mp4

    • dyauspitr16 hours ago
      Why would be a man from India based on the timing. An Indian man buried under a Baltimore bar is weird irrespective of time.

      Edit: Ah I see, it’s because Indian skeletons were frequently sold as educational tools.

    • wkat424217 hours ago
      Ah thanks that link worked for me in Europe.
  • bell-cot15 hours ago
    > Because of the skeleton’s age, The Bluebird [bar] said it did not contact Baltimore Police to look into the discovery. The department’s policy is ...

    WARNING: This sort of policy varies by municipality. If you'd prefer to minimize unpleasant interactions with your local law enforcement, do not make assumptions.

  • artie_effim13 hours ago
    Dang - that's like 4 blocks from my house!
  • xhkkffbf12 hours ago
    This is the kind of reason I pay for good journalism. Not to get some endorsement for an election. I can make up my own mind. I want someone to do the searching and write up.
  • pmdulaney3 days ago
    Improved title: "Whose skeleton was buried by a secret society under this Baltimore bar?"
    • qup17 hours ago
      In the new title, the skeleton has gone from person to property.
      • Strang15 hours ago
        Grammatical possession does not imply property. "My grandmother," "my hometown," "my skeleton," etc.
        • drhagen14 hours ago
          In Chapter 21 of the Screwtape Letters, CS Lewis discusses the dangers of interchanging of the various flavors of "my". (Well, a fictional demon monologues about the utility of confusing "my" in the mind of humans, but that's the Screwtape Letters for you.)
      • LoganDark17 hours ago
        I would say the skeleton is a property of the body. I wouldn't say I'm my skeleton - I'm just a flesh automaton animated by neurotransmitters...
      • fluoridation12 hours ago
        No skeleton has ever been a person.
    • 17 hours ago
      undefined
  • wkat424217 hours ago
    [flagged]
    • 17 hours ago
      undefined