16 points | by JumpCrisscross9 hours ago
This neuters the word "censorship."
We "censor," per this definition, fraud, false advertising, libel, slander, et cetera. Our system of allocating spectrum for radio or nearly-century old media foreign-ownership rules [1] similarly fall afoul of this definition.
[1] https://www.fcc.gov/enforcement/areas/foreign-ownership-unau...
China also bans entire platforms as well. If America had functioning consumer protections we would have outlawed platforms like TikTok, Facebook and Instagram years ago, but we don't. Our technocrats kiss ass like it's their legally wedded wife and end up getting political exemptions because they grovel nicely: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj4d75zl212o
The issue isn't reciprocity - that's always an absurd whataboutism excuse. The issue is that TikTok is a state asset, and since they refuse to be anything but an organ of the Chinese Communist Party they cannot persist in a market that prioritizes fair and equal competition. We've already seen how TikTok is weaponized against democratic nations: https://kyivinsider.com/russia-and-china-just-rigged-romania...