5 comments

  • htrp1 小时前
    Serious question. WHAT EXACTLY sits in Reality Labs? You can't expect me to believe the oculus vr glasses cost 4.4bn in R&D.
  • bentt3 小时前
    Meta has stunted VR development by monopolizing the talent and the marketplace. They act like they are the benevolent stewards of the future metaverse, but just like with Facebook, all they want is to dominate and productize the world’s attention.
  • anyi0988110 小时前
    I am curious what are the deliverables from RL after spending all these money? Have they calculated the real ROI?
  • didip9 小时前
    Considering the stocks gain, is it really a loss tho?
    • almog7 小时前
      Stock owners PnL isn't part of profit/loss calculations.
  • xenospn10 小时前
    …how?!

    Can someone smarter than me please do the math and figure out how a company burns through >$17 billion dollars in a single year developing anything?

    • A_D_E_P_T10 小时前
      If you go by the chart at the link, they've lost 54.9 billion dollars since Q4 2020. [1] Do they have any products that can, even in principle, recoup that kind of loss? Is there some kind of tax scheme that can explain this?

      [1] - From Q1 2020 to the present: (2.1 + 1.83 + 2.43 + 2.63 + 3.3 + 2.96 + 2.81 + 3.67 + 4.28 + 3.99 + 3.74 + 3.74 + 4.65 + 3.85 + 4.49 + 4.43) -- The trend is clearly accelerating. Could build a cool scatterplot.

      • jordanb3 小时前
        My theory all along was that they spent maybe 20 billion on Reality Labs and the rest was for Zuckerberg's secret volcano lair but it's getting to a point where that can't really justify it either. Maybe they're working on the weather control laser now?
      • Ancalagon10 小时前
        Looks too big to fail now
    • nomel9 小时前
      When you setup a quest, there's an option to allow Meta to use the point cloud data that it collects. I have a strong suspicion they're training some very heavy spatial models (point cloud and camera) that will be used for understanding and content generation augmented onto/around that understanding, in AR scenarios. So, my unfounded guess is that a big chunk of it is compute. Otherwise, there's got to be a hole in the bucket.
    • Manuel_D9 小时前
      Cutting edge technology. Those Orion smart glasses use a totally novel display using micro-projectors bouncing light through waveguides etched into the silicon carbide lens. The glasses also apparently use 10 custom chips.
      • cma9 小时前
        Same field of view as years old Magic Leap 2 though. Was Silicon carbide an expensive way to work around ML's patents and get the same FOV?
        • Manuel_D5 小时前
          No, it's a much wider field of view than the magic leap 2. 45 degrees vs 70 degrees. And more importantly it's in a much smaller form factor.

          https://www.magicleap.io/hubfs/ML_22214-104-1.jpeg

          https://techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/GettyImage...

          The magic leap has a much narrower FOV, it's bulkier, and has a wired connection. The Orion are wireless, have a wider FOV, and are slimmer.

          • cma2 小时前
            Both have the same 70 degree diagonal field of view. You're comparing Meta's diagonal to ML2's horizontal.

            Its lighter, but years newer and not in significant production.

            The full wireless and self contained stuff is impressive, but not really tied to the display is it? Maybe more efficient for less battery drain? Do we have numbers on the display power consumption at a given brightness, and is it from the optics or the image source?

    • innagadadavida3 小时前
      I hope Zuckerberg is not funneling this into some sort of secret slush fund that will blow up like Enron.
    • panick21_8 小时前
      Its crazy, the whole of SpaceX Starship development is under 2 billion $ a year.